若将认识论作为诉讼证明的理论基础之一,就必须回答如何检验作为认识结果的裁判事实的真伪。但不是所有的裁判事实都需要进行检验。只有完全建立在认识论基础上,且依法正面肯定了裁判事实的案件才需要检验。检验标准裁判事实为真的标准有二:一是全体当事人对裁判事实的认可;二是在裁判事实无法获得全体当事人的认可时,裁判事实的无法证伪。 If we use epistemology as one of the theoretical foundations of litigation proof, we must answer the question of how to test the authenticity of the facts as the result of cognition. But not all the facts of the referee need to be tested. Only cases that are based entirely on epistemology and affirmed the facts of the judgments according to law need to be tested. There are two criteria for the fact that the referee is true: First, the recognition of the referee by all the parties; and second, the fact that the referee can not be falsified when the referee’s facts are not recognized by all the parties concerned.