论文部分内容阅读
孔子作为中国民办教育第一人,开辟一代教育新风,被奉为“万世师表”。但是在关于孔子究竟收不收学费的问题上,学术界一直很困扰,长期为“束脩”与“有教无类”之间的矛盾所困扰,为了解决这个困难,学者们通常通过重新诠释“束脩”来维护孔子“有教无类”的教育理念,但是由此又产生诸多新的困难,本文通过解释“束脩”的含义,证明《论语》中的这两句话不仅没有矛盾,而且恰恰是一致的:前者恰恰是后者最好的注脚。
As the first person in private education in China, Confucius opened up a new generation of education and was regarded as “Master of Worldly Affairs.” However, academics have always been troubled by the fact that Confucius did not charge tuition fees. For a long period of time, this has plagued the contradictions between “training” and “teaching without class.” In order to solve this problem, scholars Confucianism is always protected by the reinterpretation of “Shu Xiu”, but many new difficulties arise from this. This paper proves that “Analects of Confucius” "These two words in the not only no contradictions, but exactly the same: the former is precisely the latter’s best footnote.