论文部分内容阅读
电影文学剧本《反馈》是亚历山大·盖利曼编剧,写于1976年,1977年改编成话剧上演。1978年剧本发表、特别是摄成电影上映以后,苏联报刊一致给以肯定的评价,认为作品提出了一个重大的问题,即“今天建设得如何,将决定我们的明天和明天的生活。”(《戏剧》杂志,1978年第四期) 《反馈》描写某建筑公司主任努尔科夫在州委书记奥库涅夫的支持下,弄虚作假,欺上瞒下,表面上让一个重要企业的一条生产线路提前完工,实际上却使另外两条生产线路推迟两年完工,白白损失国家两千万卢布。最后虽然市委第一书记以至州委第一书记发现和揭露了他们的错误,但是已经无法挽救,不得不让工程仍按错误的方案进行下去。苏联《戏剧》杂志的评论文章认为,《反馈》说明了在现代化的工业管理中“由于‘联系渠道’的堵塞,最后造成了多么可悲的后果。”《苏联电影》杂志的评论说,《反馈》揭露了苏联工业管理部门某些人对国家的事业所抱的“满不在乎的乐观态度”和“一味揣摩上级领导意图”的作风,以及“隐藏于表面勤勉之下的官僚主义实质。”它“直率地、尖锐地,‘不顾情面地’道出了在科技革命的条件下,现代生产中原则性与妥协、大胆与怯懦是怎样表现出来的。” 象亚·盖利曼的《反馈》这样尖锐地揭露苏联工业管理方面的问题,而且涉及到州委一级的干部,在近年来的苏联工业题材作品中是不多见的。
Film literary script “feedback” is a cover film by Alexander Galilee, written in 1976, adapted into a dramatic play in 1977. After the release of the 1978 playbook, especially after the filming was released, the Soviet press consistently gave a positive assessment that the work posed a major question: “How well we build today will determine our future for tomorrow and tomorrow.” (Drama magazine, Issue 4, 1978) “Feedback” depicts the director of a construction company, Nurukh, who, with the support of State Secretary Okuriev, resorted to fraud, deceit and hide, ostensibly to an important enterprise Of a production line completed ahead of schedule, in fact, the other two production lines delayed completion of two years, in vain to lose the country 20 million rubles. In the end, although the First Secretary of the Municipal Party Committee and the First Secretary of the State Commission discovered and exposed their mistakes, they were unable to rescue them and forced the project to proceed in the wrong way. According to a review article in the Soviet drama The Drama magazine, “feedback” shows how sadly the “tragedy of the channel of communication” was blocked in modern industrial management. “” Soviet film commented, “Feedback” exposes the “indifferent optimism” that certain people in the industrial administration of the Soviet Union hold to the country’s cause and the principle of “blindly trying to figure out the superior leadership intention” and “hidden in the surface diligence The essence of bureaucracy. ”It“ outspokenly, sharply and ’without regard to the situation’ shows how principle and compromise, boldness and cowardice in modern production are manifested under the conditions of scientific and technological revolution. ”“ The ”Feedback" of Elena Galileman pointedly exposed the problems of industrial management in the Soviet Union so sharply that it involved cadres at the state level and were rarely seen in Soviet industrial themes in recent years.