论文部分内容阅读
目的:对亚洲复原力量表进行修订,并探讨其在中国大学生中的信度和效度。方法:将翻译后的亚洲复原力量表在244名大学生中进行预测,确定正式版本后以整群分层抽样法,随机抽取山东省在校大学生646名,采用亚洲复原力量表和人格五因素问卷简版(NEO-FFI)进行正式施测。结果:①探索性因素分析发现亚洲复原力量表包括自我可塑性、情绪管制和灵活应对三个维度,可解释总方差的47.1%。②验证性因素分析支持原有模型,χ2/df=2.36,RMSEA=0.055,GFI=0.923,CFI=0.908,NNFI(TLI)=0.894。③总量表的内部一致性系数(α)为0.865,分半系数为0.836,重测信度为0.894(P<0.001)。④量表总分与人格五因素中的情绪性呈显著负相关(P<0.001),而与外向性、开放性、宜人性和谨慎性均呈显著正相关(P<0.01)。结论:中文版亚洲复原力量表具有良好的信度和效度。
OBJECTIVE: To revise the Asian resilience scale and explore its reliability and validity among Chinese college students. Methods: The translated Asian Resilience Scale was used to predict among 244 college students. After the final version was determined, an overall cluster stratified sampling method was used to randomly select 646 college students in Shandong Province. The Asian resilience scale and personality five-factor questionnaire Jane (NEO-FFI) for formal testing. Results: ① Exploratory factor analysis found that the Asian resilience scale includes three dimensions: self-plasticity, emotional regulation and flexible response, accounting for 47.1% of the total variance. ② Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original model, χ2 / df = 2.36, RMSEA = 0.055, GFI = 0.923, CFI = 0.908, NNFI (TLI) = 0.894. (3) The internal consistency coefficient (α) of the total scale was 0.865, the half coefficient was 0.836, and the test-retest reliability was 0.894 (P <0.001). (4) There was a significant negative correlation between the total score of the scale and the emotionality of the five factors of personality (P <0.001), but positively correlated with the outward, open, pleasant and cautious (P <0.01). Conclusion: The Chinese version of the resilience scale in Asia has good reliability and validity.