论文部分内容阅读
在英语世界,不少学者讨论了“融贯论在德沃金法律理论中的作用”这一问题,有人认为德沃金所强调的法律的整体性就等于融贯性,也有人反对德沃金的法律理论含有融贯性的考虑。如何看待这一争论?德沃金是在追求融贯吗?本文在指出德沃金是在两种意义上使用了融贯一词——方法论意义上的融贯、作为一种实体价值的融贯——之后,对此做出回答,并进一步指出德沃金理论中对融贯论的使用在一定程度上偏离了融贯论的本意。
In the English-speaking world, many scholars have discussed the issue of “the role of coherence theory in Dworkin’s legal theory.” Some people think that the integrity of law emphasized by Dworkin is equivalent to coherence and that some people object Dworkin’s legal theory contains coherence considerations. How to treat this controversy? Does Dworkin pursue the coherence? This article points out that Dworkin uses the coherence word in two sense-methodological coherence as a kind of entity value After that, it replied and further pointed out that the use of coherence theory in Dworkin’s theory deviates from the original intention of coherence theory to a certain extent.