论文部分内容阅读
后期维特根斯坦深刻认识到任何单一的命题都不是孤立存在的,而是组成一个相互依赖的命题体系;一个命题唯有放在整个命题体系中才有认识论的意义,这一体系的整体性特征和功能构成了人类认知的基础。维特根斯坦的这种整体论思想与蒯因的整体论有诸多方面的相似,他们为共同解构传统的追求单一性、确定性和永恒性思维框架作出了贡献。但是,无论从思想取向还是从论证风格以及对知识标准的判定,二人又有较大差别。
Later Wittgenstein realized that any single proposition does not exist in isolation, but forms an interdependent proposition system. Only if a proposition has epistemological significance in the entire propositional system, the overall characteristics of the system And function constitutes the basis of human cognition. This kind of holistic thinking of Wittgenstein is similar in many respects to that of Ghynn and they contribute to the common deconstruction of the traditional framework of pursuing unity, certainty and eternity. However, there is a big difference between the two in terms of ideological orientation, argument style, and the determination of knowledge standards.