论文部分内容阅读
在公法学或者是行政法学视野中,国家行为在学术话语中仅仅会出现在讨论行政诉讼受案范围时。而在其他情况下,大家使用国家行为这个概念时,一般不会在法解释学术语框架中对其进行阐述,而更多的是将其作为一个政治概念而使用。在现阶段的域内实践中,国家行为具有行政不可诉性。对国家行为的理论完善应该从对国家行为侵权的认定开始,从国家行为与侵权的因果关系和国家侵权行为的阻却事由出发,将国家行为侵权理论与现有公法理论完成对接。且对国家行为侵权的规制可以从诉讼规制、检察院监督、人大监督等多方面加以分析。
In the field of public law or administrative jurisprudence, state behavior in academic discourse only appears when discussing the scope of administrative proceedings. In other cases, when we use the concept of state act, we generally do not elaborate on it in the framework of legal interpretation of academic terms, but more often use it as a political concept. In practice at this stage in the region, the state acts with administrative indecency. The theoretical perfection of state behavior should begin with the cognizance of state infringement of behavior and proceed from the causation of the causal relationship between state act and infringement and the obstruction of state infringement, and complete the connection between the theory of state infringement of behavior and the existing theory of public law. And the regulation of state acts of infringement can be analyzed from litigation regulation, procuratorate supervision, people’s congress supervision and other aspects.