论文部分内容阅读
随着担保借款的风行,担保官司屡见不鲜。然而用一张30万元的国库券担保借款10万元而引发的担保官司,却实乃少见。1997年11月10日,浙西衢县法院审判大厅里几乎坐满了旁听者。原告衢县种子公司诉称;原告以一张30万元的国库券作担保,为第三人衢县安仁腌制厂,从被告衢县安仁信用合作社借款10万元,谁知被告与第三人却私下将借款增至20万元,原告认为借贷双方已构成侵权。现要求被告归还30万元国库券一张;不承担20万元借款的担保责任;诉讼费由被告承担。被告衢县安仁信用合作社称:原告为第三人担保
With the prevalence of secured borrowing, security lawsuits are uncommon. However, with a 300,000 yuan treasury bonds to guarantee 100,000 yuan loan guarantees litigation, but it is rare. November 10, 1997, Zhejiang Qu County court trial hall almost filled with observers. The plaintiff Qu County Seed Company sued that the plaintiff secured a treasury bond of 300,000 yuan for the third-person Anxian pickling factory and borrowed 100,000 yuan from the defendant Quxian Anren Credit Cooperative, who knows the defendant and the third party But privately increased the loan to 200,000 yuan, the plaintiff that the lenders and borrowers have constituted infringement. The defendant is required to return a 300,000 yuan Treasury bill; does not assume 200,000 yuan loan guarantee responsibility; litigation costs borne by the defendant. Defendant Qu County Anren Credit Cooperatives said: The plaintiff for the third person