后世论王安石变法,批评者很多。明代陈汝锜《甘露团长书》说:“介甫以新法负谤于当时,贻指摘于后世,善状不彰,而恶声嘈嘈满耳,此古今一大冤案!”史学界有一种观点,以为安石身后所以长期遭非议,大理学家朱熹起了决定作用,时至当今,这一问题应予辨正。笔者以为,首先,朱熹以理学家身份曾不遗余力地抨击新法,他的批评对后世评价王安石变法影响极大,但朱熹对王安石的社会政治思想并未一概否定,在若干方面倒做出了肯定评价,他在任地方官时的许多施政措施,更直接承袭了王氏新法。其次,朱熹对王安石的抨击并非如某些人所指责的那样,是“深文诟病”、“恶声嘈嘈”的谤诬之辞,而是言之成理,反映了朱熹对社会变革问题的认识深度。澄清这一问题,不仅有助于深入研究王安石变法,更有利于深入研究朱熹的社会政治思想及其活动。 Later on Wang Anshi change method, a lot of critics. Ming Dynasty Chen Rudan “dew chief dean,” said: “As soon as the new law negative slander at the time, Yi refers to the later generations, unscrupulous, and bad sound noises, this ancient and modern one big injustice!” Historians have a point of view, After thinking that he had long been criticized for being a rock, the Daliologist Zhu Xi played a decisive role. From now on, this issue should be resolved. I think, first of all, Zhu Xi spared no effort to criticize the new law as a rationalist, his criticism of Wang Anshi later evaluation of great influence, but Zhu Xi Wang Anshi’s social and political thought has not been denied, in a number of ways made a positive evaluation Many of his administration measures while he was in office were more directly followed by Wang’s new law. Second, Zhu Xi’s criticism of Wang Anshi was not a libelous speech of “deep-rooted criticism” or “noisy sound of evil”, as some people have accused him. Instead, Zhu Xi reflected the change of social transformation Depth of understanding. Clarifying this issue will not only be helpful for further studying Wang Anshi ’s reform, but also for further studying Zhu Xi’ s social and political thoughts and activities.