论文部分内容阅读
以西方环境伦理学为思想基础推导环境法理论的“环境伦理法学”是当今环境法研究中的一个普遍现象,然而,这种理论及其论证路径存在:理论前提虚无、信仰真理化、缺乏本土思维与大众意识、核心理论正当性不足、颠倒伦理与法的关系、道德性过高、缺乏法律思维、忽视程序价值、实践论证不足等弊端。环境伦理学虽然在人类反思和探索与自然的和谐关系方面有其价值独到之处,但其理论现状尚不足以直接应用于法学理论建构,其法律实践更须慎重。环境法研究应有“自我”意识,注意本土思维、大众思维和法律思维的运用。环境法制建设需要的是对既有法律大厦的修补与改造而不是颠覆与革命。
However, this theory and its argument path exist: the precondition of the theory is nothingness, the belief of the truth, the theory of the environment, Lack of local thinking and public awareness, lack of legitimacy of the core theory, reversing the relationship between ethics and law, morality is too high, the lack of legal thinking, ignore the value of the program, lack of practical proof and other shortcomings. Although environmental ethics has its unique value in the reconsideration of mankind and the harmonious relationship between exploration and nature, its theoretical status quo is not enough to apply directly to the construction of jurisprudence theory, and its legal practice should be more cautious. Environmental law research should have “self ” consciousness, pay attention to the use of local thinking, mass thinking and legal thinking. What is needed for the construction of an environmental legal system is the repair and transformation of existing legal mansions rather than subversion and revolution.