距今已经过去两年多的河南安阳“曹操墓事件”事件中,充满了真假是非、变幻反复等新闻传播焦点,甚至出现了参与其中的某“学者”实为逃犯的重大新闻爆料,整个传播过程仿佛一出跌宕起伏的戏剧。一个普通的考古研究成果能够横生出这么多枝节而成为一个扑朔迷离的新闻事件,是与新闻媒体的过度参与有很大关系的。媒体对于考古研究这种严谨的学术领域的参与,要有基本的专业准备,减少常识性的失误;同时,考古研究成果的发布也要注意把握时机和主体。 In the incident of “Cao Cao Tomb Incident” in Anyang, Henan Province, which has been more than two years ago, it is full of the focus of news dissemination such as truth-seeking and non-repetition, change repeatedly, and even the emergence of a certain “scholar” who is actually a fugitive. News broke the news, the whole process of communication seems like an ups and downs of the drama. The result of a common archaeological research that can shed so many branches and become a complicated news event has a lot to do with the excessive participation of news media. Media participation in this rigorous academic field of archeological research should have basic professional preparation to reduce errors in common sense; meanwhile, the release of archaeological research results should also pay attention to grasping the timing and subject.