郭店楚简自出土后受到了极大的重视，几乎成了重写思想史的象征。它不仅为解决中国古代思想史上的若干疑案提供了珍贵的线索，从思想史研究的方法论角度看，也有着重要的意义。同时本文指出，只有认清郭店楚简在思想史研究中的局限性，才能对它更好地加以运用。 Guo Dian Chu since the unearthed has received great attention, almost became a symbol of rewriting the history of ideas. It not only provides valuable clues for resolving several mysteries in the history of ancient Chinese thought, but also has important meanings from the perspective of methodology in the study of the history of ideas. At the same time, this article points out that only by recognizing the limitations of Guodian Chu in the research of the history of thoughts can we use it better.