论文部分内容阅读
某市科技报于1986年5月5日刊登《眼科老中医陈贯一诊治重症肌无力症疗效好》的报道以来,引出病人诉医生侵犯肖像权和隐私权的诉讼并引起各界人士的关注。1989年9月25日某市某区一审法院又认定科技报社和陈贯一侵犯原告朱某肖像权,并判处他们各赔偿60元。于是议论四起,特别是一些医学界人土纷纷担心判决一旦开出先例,以后医学临床知识的普及、宣传和研究就很难开展了。由于该案在肖像权纠纷中具有特殊性,以及在隐私权纠纷中的领先性,为此,笔者根据我国民法通则的有关规定和立法精神对其进行具体分析和论证。
Since May 5, 1986, a science and technology newspaper of the city has published a report on the efficacy of treating and treating myasthenia gravis by Chen Guangyi, an old ophthalmology doctor who sued doctors for infringement on portrait rights and privacy rights and aroused the public's attention. On September 25, 1989, a district court of first instance in a certain city of a certain city also found that the technology newspaper and Chen Guanyi infringed upon the plaintiffs' right to portrait Zhu and sentenced them to compensation of 60 yuan each. So talking about four, in particular, some people in the medical community have been worried about the verdict once the precedent, after the clinical knowledge of medical coverage, advocacy and research is difficult to carry out. Because of the particularity of the case in the dispute of portrait rights and the leading role in the dispute of privacy, the author conducts a concrete analysis and demonstration on the basis of the relevant provisions of the general principles of civil law in our country and its legislation.