论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨康复治疗对稳定型心绞痛患者介入治疗后心功能和生活质量的影响。方法将2015年12月—2016年12月于该院接受治疗63例稳定型心绞痛患者作为研究对象,对比采用常规治疗(对照组,30例)与在常规治疗基础上增用心脏康复治疗(观察组,33例),对两组患者心功能及生活质量的改善情况。结果比较两组患者在接受相应临床治疗措施后的PL、AS、AF评分情况,治疗4个月后的评分均明显高于治疗1个月后,对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组的评分高于对照组,组间对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,在生活质量改善方面,观察组与对照组的PL、AS、AF改善率分别为75.76%、60.61%、57.58%和50.00%、40.00%、36.67%,观察组明显优于对照组且组间对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床上在治疗稳定型心绞痛患者时,可在常规治疗的基础上增用心脏康复治疗措施,能够显著提高患者的心功能,并改善其生活质量。
Objective To investigate the effect of rehabilitation on cardiac function and quality of life in patients with stable angina after interventional therapy. Methods 63 patients with stable angina pectoris receiving treatment in our hospital from December 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Compared with conventional therapy (control group, n = 30) and heart rehabilitation therapy (observation Group, 33 cases), the improvement of cardiac function and quality of life in two groups of patients. Results The scores of PL, AS and AF in the two groups after receiving the corresponding clinical treatment measures were significantly higher after 4 months of treatment than those after 1 month of treatment (P <0.05). The score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). In addition, in the quality of life improvement, the improvement rates of PL, AS and AF in the observation group and the control group were 75.76%, 60.61%, 57.58% and 50.00%, 40.00% and 36.67% respectively. The observation group was superior to the control group and the group The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris, clinical rehabilitation measures can be added on the basis of routine treatment, which can significantly improve patients’ heart function and improve their quality of life.