论文部分内容阅读
唯冠与苹果商标案,不仅引发了二者之间在商业上的对决,也引发了学术上的大讨论。其中iPad商标的归属不管在现实中还是学术上都是争论的焦点。而该案涉及国际竞争,很容易让人联想到商标独立性。第一,iPad商标应该属于驰名商标;第二,商标独立性的内涵是什么,以及相关的立法现状;第三,商标独立性从商标的注册、驰名商标的认定、商标转让等方面限制驰名商标的。
Proview and Apple trademark case, not only led to the commercial duel between the two, also led to a big academic discussion. Which iPad trademark attribution no matter in reality or academic are the focus of controversy. The case involved international competition, it is easy to make people think of trademark independence. First, the iPad trademark should belong to the well-known trademark; secondly, what is the connotation of the trademark independence and the status quo of the relevant legislation? Thirdly, the trademark independence limits the well-known trademark from the aspects of trademark registration, recognition of well-known trademark and trademark transfer of.