因犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的刻意隐瞒以及司法机关的认识差错、异地管辖的信息滞后、身份信息系统的不够完善等原因,无论是在侦查阶段、审查起诉阶段还是在审理阶段、刑罚执行期间或刑罚执行之后都有可能出现发现漏罪的情况。前罪刑罚在漏罪立案后尚未判决前已执行完毕,对于此种漏罪可否适用数罪并罚原则,与前罪共同评价?笔者从一个案例出发,就数罪并罚原则、刑法有关漏罪的规定、社会影响后果等三个方面进行思考,对刑罚执行完毕后漏罪的处理提出一些浅显的意见。 Due to the criminal suspects, the accused deliberately concealed and misunderstandings of the judiciary, remote information lags behind, identity information system is not perfect enough and other reasons, both in the prosecution phase or in the trial stage, during the execution of the sentence or After the execution of penalties, there may be cases of leakage found. Punishment before the crime of crime before the verdict has been sentenced before the execution has been completed, for such leakage can be applied to the principle of joint punishment of several crimes, and the former crime together to evaluate the author starting from a case, on the principle of multiple crimes and punishments, criminal law related to leakage The provisions of sin, the social consequences of the consequences of such thinking, the implementation of the penalty after the execution of the crime to put forward some simple views.