论文部分内容阅读
1901年9月7日,英、美、法、德、日、俄、奥、意八国联军的铁蹄踏破中国国门,强迫清政府签订了丧权辱国的不平等条约———《辛丑条约》,从此中国背负起4.5亿两白银的巨额赔款。赔款分39年付清,按年息4厘,共本息9.8亿两。美国作为当时的受益国,获得赔款3293.9万余两(折合美金约2444.1万),但当时美国的实际“损失”只有1365.5万美元。对此美国进行了两次退款。究竟美国的退款善举是一种自我赎罪,还是另有图谋?一、驻美公使梁诚发现1901年美国向中国索取的庚子赔款数额,与其在北京等地受义和团焚杀劫掠的实际损失不相符合,捏造的赔款数额远远超过实际损失1904年美国同意庚子退款,首
On September 7, 1901, the iron brigade of the British, American, French, German, Japanese, Russian, Austrian and Italian allied forces stampeded the Chinese nation and forced the Qing government to sign the unequal treatise on humiliation and humiliation - the “Xinchu Treaty.” Since then, China shoulders huge claims of 450 million taels of silver. Indemnity 39 years to pay off, according to 4% per annum, a total of 0.98 million total interest and two. As the then beneficiary country, the United States received 32.929 million yuan (equivalent to approximately 24.441 million U.S. dollars) of indemnity, but the actual U.S. “loss” was only 13.655 million U.S. dollars. The United States made two refunds. After all, what is the U.S. act of offering money back for self-redemption? Or is it another attempt? First, Liang Cheng, the U.S. ambassador to the United States, found the amount of compensation for the United States kidnapping to China from 1901, Losses do not match, fabricated the amount of compensation far more than the actual loss 1904 United States agreed Geng refunds, the first