论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对临床记忆量表多媒体测查与手工操作方法进行对照比较 ,确定两种方法的一致性。方法 :随机抽取被试 5 0名 ,先后接受两种测验方法的测查。结果 :两种测验方法在临床记忆量表五项分测验的原始分、量表分、年龄量表分及记忆商上无显著性差异。结论 :临床记忆量表多媒体测查方法与手工操作方法具有高度的一致性 ,并且有可能提高量表的标准化程度和效果
OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast the multimedia test and manual operation method of clinical memory scale to confirm the consistency of the two methods. Methods: Fifty subjects were randomly selected and tested by two test methods. Results: There was no significant difference between the two test methods in the original score, scale score, age scale score and memory quotient in the five minutes of clinical memory scale test. Conclusion: There is a high degree of consistency between the methods of multimedia testing of clinical memory scale and manual methods, and it is possible to improve the standardization degree and effect of scale