论文部分内容阅读
在社会公众强烈诉求实质公平,而司法裁判又不能罔顾法条主义的时代背景下,现行显失公平规则的简单、滞后与不周延性,已不足以支撑裁判者从容应对大量显失公平案件的妥洽处理。应以主观价值论为基本立场,坚持显失公平规则采程序公平标准与结果公平标准兼顾的立法模式,以诚实信用原则为基准,对显失公平规则的适用,从“权利义务明显违反公平、等价有偿原则”、“导致对方没有自由选择可能性的情势”、“利用”三个方面提出具体的适用标准。显失公平规则的真正生命力并不限于逻辑的自足与规则的精密,关键在于其高度开放的特性与法官能动性的发挥,应允许法官根据诚实信用原则做出创造性的判决。
In the era when the public strongly demands substantive justice and the judicial adjudication can not disregard legalism, the simple, lagging and indecisive nature of the current apparent unfair rules is not enough to support the arbitrators in dealing with a large number of obvious and unfair cases Deal with the deal. The subjective value theory should be taken as the basic standpoint, the insistence of unfair and fair rules should be adopted on the basis of the principle of fairness and fairness of results, the principle of good faith should be taken as a benchmark, and the application of explicit and unfair rules shall be obviously violated from the principle of “ , The principle of equal payment ”“, ”lead to the other side has no freedom to choose the possibility of “, ”use " three aspects of the specific applicable standards. The real vitality of manifestly unfair rules is not limited to logical self-sufficiency and the precision of rules. The key lies in its highly open nature and the activeness of judges. Judges should be allowed to make creative judgments based on the principle of good faith.