论文部分内容阅读
随着中国法学的逐渐恢复和发展,法学在跨学科的法律研究上有了新进展,这便是在原先的法律研究上更加注重实证的研究方法:社科法学。自从苏力在讨论中国法学格局时提出这一称谓后,十多年来,社科法学得到了很快的发展,并且愈加得到法律人的重视。于是,社科法学便与传统的法教义学逐渐有了对立之势。在众多法学的研究方法之中,法教义学能够恰到好处地体现法律人的知识和思维能力,但是社科法学却以它自成一派的亲和力以及更加能够对社会额公共政策给予满足的优势脱颖而出。从目前的发展状况来看,社科法学会在中国有一席之地,甚至可能比一些欧美国家发展得更加出色。本文从社科法学的发展实况出发,浅谈社科法学的跨界格局与实证前景。
With the gradual restoration and development of Chinese jurisprudence, jurisprudence has made new progress in the interdisciplinary legal research. This is a more empirical approach to the study of law: social science law. Since Su Li proposed this title when discussing China’s jurisprudence, social science law has developed rapidly for more than a decade and has gained more and more attention from legal professionals. As a result, social science law and traditional legal doctrine gradually have the opposite trend. Among the many jurisprudential methods of study, legal doctrine can properly reflect the legal person’s knowledge and thinking skills, but social science legal science stands out from its own affiliation and the ability to be more satisfied with the social public policy. Judging from the current development situation, the Institute of Social Science Law has a place in China and may even develop even better than some European and American countries. This article starts from the development of social science jurisprudence, and discusses the transboundary structure and positive prospect of social science law.