论文部分内容阅读
知识产权纠纷运用诉讼和调解两种方式,在两种方式间自由转换,事实上就是结合诉讼和诉讼外调解制度,让诉讼和非诉讼的解决方式得到最大化的互补和发挥。近年来,知识产权纠纷诉调对接制度在我国部分地区已有先行试点的实践经验。构建完善的知识产权纠纷诉调对接机制,应界定“诉调对接”内涵,打造多元化的、司法机构主导的对接平台,构建科学合理的“诉调对接”流程体系。
The use of litigation and conciliation in intellectual property disputes in two ways, free to switch between the two ways, in fact, is a combination of litigation and non-litigation mediation system so that litigation and non-litigation solution to maximize the complementarity and play. In recent years, the intellectual property rights dispute docking system has been piloted in some parts of China’s practical experience. To establish and improve the docking mechanism of disputes over intellectual property disputes, we should define the connotation of “docking” and create a diversified and judiciary-dominated docking platform to build a scientific and rational “matching and docking” system.