论文部分内容阅读
抽取2012年6月~2014年6月在本院就诊的60例继发性脑室出血患者为研究对象,随机分为观察组与对照组各30例;对照组患者给予传统脑室外引流术,观察组患者给予改良脑室穿刺术;对两组患者治疗情况进行观察比较。根据两组患者的各项指标对比发下,观察组和对照组在手术之前的GCS评分对比无明显差异(P>0.05)。观察组患者24 h血肿消除率和3个月GOS评分明显高于对照组;观察组带管时间和颅内感染以及脑积水明显低于对照组,观察组治疗效果明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。改良性脑室穿刺术的患者在治疗之后的各项指标明显由于传统对照组的效果,因此,值得在临床中推广及使用。
Sixty patients with secondary intraventricular hemorrhage who were treated in our hospital from June 2012 to June 2014 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 30 cases each. Patients in the control group were given conventional ventricular extracorporeal drainage Group patients were given modified ventricular puncture; the treatment of two groups were observed and compared. According to the comparison of each index of two groups of patients, there was no significant difference (P> 0.05) between the observation group and the control group before the operation GCS score. The 24-hour hematoma elimination rate and 3-month GOS score in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The time of tube insertion, intracranial infection and hydrocephalus in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The treatment group in the observation group was significantly better than the control group (P <0.05). After the treatment of patients with modified ventricular puncture of the indicators obviously due to the effect of the traditional control group, therefore, worth in the clinical promotion and use.