论文部分内容阅读
中国史学传统与西方史学传统有不同的理路。现代中国在西方思想资源的启示下,开始了史学革 命,产生了现代史学。但由于在理路上没有跳出革命史学的窠臼,新中国史学也发生了过度政治化的失误。当 前,中国史学的问题依然是理论和方法问题,以当代史的问题更为突出。必须以全球化视野,借鉴不同学术背景 的研究理论和研究方法,促进学术进步。文中以麦克法夸尔的“铁三角”理论范式为个例,从理论层次,述事方 式,分析结构,以史鉴今的适用性等方面,对照分析中西史学的所长所短,以确定中国当代史研究中需要解决的 理路问题。
Chinese historiography has a different course of thinking than western historiography. With the enlightenment of western ideological resources, modern China began the revolution of historiography and created the modern historiography. However, due to the fact that there was no escape from the stereotypes of revolutionary historiography, the new Chinese historiography also experienced excessive politicized mistakes. At present, the issue of Chinese history is still a matter of theory and method, and the issue of contemporary history is even more prominent. We must learn from the global perspective, learn from different academic backgrounds of research theory and research methods to promote academic progress. This article takes McFarquar ’s “Iron Triangle” theory paradigm as an example, analyzes the structure of the history of China and the West separately from the theoretical level, narrative style, analysis of the structure, the applicability of history Kam now, etc., to determine Problems to be solved in the study of Chinese contemporary history.