论文部分内容阅读
2012年新修订的《刑事诉讼法》对非法证据排除做出了明确规定,即:采用刑讯逼供等非法方法收集的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人供述和采用暴力、威胁等非法方法收集的证人证言、被害人陈述,不得作为定案的根据。收集物证、书证不符合法定程序,可能严重影响司法公正,不能补正或者做出合理解释的,不得作为定案的根据。非法证据排除制度的确立对于健全我国刑事诉讼程序具有重要意义,但仍然存在一定缺陷,需要不断进行完善。
The newly revised Criminal Procedure Law of 2012 clearly stipulated the exclusion of illegal evidences: testimony of witnesses collected by criminal suspects, defendants’ confessions and other illegal methods such as violence and threats collected through illegal means such as torture, The victim’s statement shall not be used as the basis for the verdict. Collection of physical evidence, card does not meet legal procedures, may seriously affect the justice, can not make corrections or make a reasonable explanation, shall not be used as the basis for the verdict. The establishment of an exclusionary system of illegal evidence is of great significance to the improvement of criminal procedure in our country. However, there are still some shortcomings that need to be constantly perfected.