论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过对比两种不同的临床治疗乳腺癌的效果,提出临床治疗乳腺癌更可靠的方案,为临床治疗和相关研究提供参考。方法:选取我院2010年12月至2014年12月期间我院临床收治的乳腺癌患者56例,根据患者临床治疗手术方法情况,分成了研究组和对照组,研究组患者给予乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术,对照组患者均给予常规的腋窝淋巴结清扫术,观察和比较两者患者实施不同手术治疗后的手术时间、住院费用、术中出血量和并发症发生情况。结果:研究组患者的手术时间长于对照组,研究组患者的住院费用高于对照组,而患者术中出血量研究组患者也低于对照组患者,组问比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后并发症的发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术相比较,乳腔镜手术所需时间较长,并且治疗费用偏高,临床上应给予患者的个体差异情况有针对性的选择实施。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two different clinical treatments for breast cancer and to propose a more reliable clinical treatment of breast cancer, providing a reference for clinical treatment and related research. Methods: From December 2010 to December 2014 in our hospital 56 cases of breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital, according to the clinical treatment of patients with surgical conditions, divided into the study group and the control group, the study group given laparoscopic axillary Lymphadenectomy and control group were given routine axillary lymph node dissection. The operation time, hospitalization cost, intraoperative blood loss and complications after operation of the two groups were observed and compared. Results: The operation time of the study group was longer than that of the control group. The hospitalization expense of the study group was higher than that of the control group, while the patients in the study group were also lower in the study group than the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the conventional axillary lymph node dissection, laparoscopic surgery takes longer time, and the high cost of treatment, clinical patients should be given individual differences in the targeted selection and implementation.