论文部分内容阅读
案例2003年底,刘先生对某小区的一套商品房进行实地察看后,非常满意。在与开发商讨价还价后,刘先生买下该套商品房。之后,双方签订了商品房买卖合同,约定价款按套计算,该商品房总价款为145万元。合同中标明:“该商品房建筑面积共139.6平方米,其中,套内建筑面积121.4平方米,公共部位与公用房屋分摊建筑面积18.2平方米。”可产权证下来后,刘先生发现,该商品房的套内建筑面积只有118.16平方米,比合同约定的少了3.24平方米。据此,刘先生要求开发商承担违约责任,退还多收的房款。开发商则认为该商品房是按套销售的,不论面积多少,而且在签订商品房买卖合同之前,刘先生已经实地察看了该商品房,因此不同意退给刘先生房款。
Case by the end of 2003, Mr. Liu on a residential area of a commercial housing field inspection, very satisfied. After bargaining with the developer, Mr. Liu bought the set of commercial housing. After the two sides signed a contract for the sale of commercial housing, agreed price by set of calculations, the total price of commercial housing was 1.45 million. The contract marked: “The commercial housing construction area of a total of 139.6 square meters, of which, the building area of 121.4 square meters, public areas and public housing shared construction area of 18.2 square meters. ” Certificate of Competence down, Mr. Liu found that the Commercial housing construction area of only 118.16 square meters, less than the contract agreed 3.24 square meters. Accordingly, Mr. Liu asked developers to assume responsibility for breach of contract, refund the overcharged housing fund. Developers believe that the sale of commercial housing is by sets, no matter how much area, but also in the real estate sales contract signed before, Mr. Liu has been on the ground inspection of the commercial housing, so do not agree to return the money to Mr. Liu.