论文部分内容阅读
我国的承诺制度基本以欧共体的“承诺决定制度”为蓝本。但我国《反垄断法》在设计承诺制度时并未像美国、欧盟等发达国家和地区一样有着成熟的配套制度随之共同落地,而仅仅在第45条做了简略的规定。文章认为由此导致我国的承诺制度存在案件适用条件不明、执法机关与经营者之间存在动态差异性以及事后监督不健全、缺乏完善的处罚规定等问题。为此,有必要对我国《反垄断法》中的承诺制度进行评析,并为之存在的问题提出对策。
The basic principle of China’s commitment system is based on the EC’s “commitment-determination system.” However, the antitrust law in our country did not have a mature supporting system like the United States, the European Union and other developed countries and regions in the process of designing a commitment system. However, only the article 45 made a brief provision. The article thinks that the promised system of our country has some problems such as the application conditions of cases, the dynamic differences between law enforcement agencies and operators, the imperfect post-supervision and the lack of perfect punishment rules. Therefore, it is necessary to make an assessment of the system of commitment in China’s “Anti-Monopoly Law” and put forward some countermeasures for the existing problems.