论文部分内容阅读
本文结合CNKI和CSSCI收集研究资料,利用定性研究方法——文献分析法,从开放存取期刊的概念与类型、产生与发展、出版模式、整合与利用、质量评价以及图书馆的做法等角度,综合分析开放存取期刊的研究进展,认为可从以下4个方面开展后续研究:第一,“同行评议”可否作为限定条件之一,纳入开放存取期刊概念范畴;“延迟型开放存取期刊”中的延迟时间是否需要规定;第二,需继续研究国内外成功的开放存取期刊经济运行模式,并针对国内学术期刊现行的经济运行模式提出建议;第三,需加强对开放存取期刊集成平台信息资源组织现状的研究,以及对国外图书馆整合开放存取期刊资源的研究;第四,需从理论和实证研究两个层面加强对Altmetrics运用于评价开放存取期刊学术影响力的研究。另指出:开放存取期刊是未来学术交流的主流载体。
Based on the collection of research data by CNKI and CSSCI, this paper uses the qualitative research method - literature analysis, from the perspective of the concept and type of open access journals, generation and development, publishing mode, integration and utilization, quality evaluation and library practices, Based on a comprehensive analysis of the research progress of OA, we believe that follow-up research can be carried out in the following four aspects: First, whether “peer review” can be included in the concept of open access journals as one of the qualifications; "delayed- Second, we must continue to study the economic operation mode of successful open access journals at home and abroad, and make recommendations for the current economic operation mode of academic journals in our country. Third, we need to strengthen the understanding of whether the delay time in accessing journals The research on the status quo of the organization of information resources in the integrated platform of open access journals and the research on the integration of open access journals resources in foreign libraries; fourthly, it is necessary to strengthen the application of Altmetrics in the evaluation of open access journals from both theoretical and empirical aspects Influence research. In addition, it points out that OA is the mainstream carrier of future academic exchanges.