论文部分内容阅读
案例:张某9岁的儿子在李某所经营的小卖部购买了一袋包装粗糙、味道可疑的“三无”产品“辣条”。吃后因肚子剧烈疼痛,被送往医院救治,并被确诊为急性食物中毒。经有关部门鉴定,系食用过期劣质“辣条”所致。面对张某索要2200余元医疗费用的请求,李某以“辣条”并非其所生产为由一再拒绝。那么,李某究竟应否担责?说法:李某必须承担赔偿责任。李某违反了自身的法定义务。《消费者权益保护法》第十八条规定:“经营者应当保证其提供的商品或者服务符
Case: Zhang 9-year-old son bought a bag of rough, taste suspicious ”three no “ product ”spicy“ in the canteen run by Lee. Severe stomach pain after eating, was taken to the hospital for treatment and was diagnosed with acute food poisoning. Appraised by the relevant departments, Department of food expired poor quality ”spicy “ due. The face of Zhang asked for more than 2,200 yuan medical expenses, Lee to ”spicy “ is not the reason for its production repeatedly refused. So, Lee should be responsible for what? Say: Lee must bear the liability. Lee violated its own statutory obligations. ”Consumer Protection Law“ Article XVIII provides: ”The operator shall ensure that the goods or services provided