安克斯密特的“文本权威消失”一说,引发了对文本与解释之间关系的思考,虽然文本在史学研究中的“硬性”是不容否认的,但随着史学研究活动的逐步推进、层层深化,文本的“硬性”越来越“弱化”,而史家解释的“弹性”却越来越明显。 Anksmitt’s “disappearance of textual authority” has triggered a reflections on the relationship between texts and explanations. Although the “hardness” of texts in history studies can not be denied, with the gradual promotion of historiography activities , Layers of deepening, the text of the “hard” more and more “weakening”, and historians explain the “flexibility” is more and more obvious.