论文部分内容阅读
本文通过案例分析,说明法官对公共政策进行自由裁量时,在不同案件背景下,公共政策的运用可能带来不同的判决结果。在本案例中,香港法院承认内地法院离婚判决时,公共政策是其考量的重要因素。由此也证明,公共政策在香港法院和内地法院相互承认离婚判决中具有合法性与必要性。但是,公共政策是否可以无限制的被运用?答案显然是否定的。
Through case analysis, this paper shows that when judges judge the public policy freely, the application of public policy may bring different judgments in different circumstances. In this case, when Hong Kong courts recognized the divorce decision of a mainland court, public policy was an important factor in its consideration. It also proves that public policy has the legitimacy and necessity in the mutual recognition of divorce judgments between Hong Kong courts and mainland courts. But can public policy be used without restriction? Obviously the answer is no.