论文部分内容阅读
目的比较空管药物疗法和根管充填术治疗乳牙牙髓炎的临床疗效。方法选择2008年3月至2009年12月在惠州市第三人民医院口腔科门诊就诊的乳牙牙髓炎患儿160例(160颗患牙),随机分为空管药物组(空管药物疗法)和根管充填组(根管充填术),各80颗患牙。比较2种治疗方法的临床疗效。结果空管药物组治疗成功率为97.5%,略高于根管充填组(93.8%),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论空管药物疗法成功率较高,操作简单,可减少患儿群体复诊次数,是适合儿童的一种较好的治疗方法。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of empty tube drug therapy and root canal filling in the treatment of deciduous pulpitis. Methods From March 2008 to December 2009, 160 cases (160 teeth) of children with deciduous pulpitis who visited the Department of Stomatology, Third People’s Hospital of Huizhou City were randomly divided into two groups: empty tube drug therapy ) And root canal filling group (root canal filling), each with 80 teeth. Compare the clinical efficacy of two kinds of treatment. Results The success rate of the empty tube drug group was 97.5%, slightly higher than that of the root canal filling group (93.8%). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion The success rate of empty tube drug therapy is high and the operation is simple, which can reduce the frequency of referral for children. It is a better treatment method for children.