论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》第73条规定赋予了公安机关交通警察部门制作道路交通故责任认定书的权力,但是此规定并没有明确此认定书的性质,导致其在诉讼证据体系中地位缺失。同时,整部法条也没明确交通警察部门的行为性质。但是,在实践中,法院却照搬交通警察部门制作的认定书的责任划分,这就使得在刑事审判中认定书的地位显要,因为此认定书关系到当事人罪与非罪,罪轻与罪重的区分。因此,对交通警察部门制作责任认定书的行为的效力进行法律分析并因此赋予当事人对交通事故认定书的诉权是保障当事人合法权益的最佳途径。本文拟就上述问题作粗浅探讨。
Article 73 of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Road Traffic Safety gives the traffic police department of the public security organ the power to make a liability certificate for road traffic accidents. However, this stipulation does not clarify the nature of this certificate, which leads to its position in the lawsuit evidence system Missing. At the same time, the entire law does not specify the nature of the traffic police department’s conduct. However, in practice, the courts have copied the division of responsibility of the certificates made by the traffic police department, which makes the position of the book of affirmation in criminal trials significant because it is related to the parties’ sin and non-sin, sin and sin The distinction. Therefore, a legal analysis of the effectiveness of the traffic police department in making a certificate of responsibility and therefore giving the parties the right to sue for a traffic accident certificate is the best way to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned. This article intends to make a brief discussion on the above issues.