《教育研究》有许多特点,我不想过多称赞,我想根据我多年阅读该刊的印象提几条意见。 第一,该刊有些文章语言太枯燥。一般说来,研究性文章比通俗性文章读起来显得枯燥一些,但有的文章过于单调乏味了,读起来令人昏昏欲睡,读后浑然不知所云。贵刊是否可以提倡一下,要求作者的书面语言生动活泼,增强可读性?一篇好的研究文章,不仅思想要深邃,而且语言、谋篇布局等也都应是上乘的。不要认为让人弄不懂那些名词术语的才算好文章。 There are many characteristics of “educational research”. I do not want to be overblown, and I would like to make a few comments based on my impression of reading it for many years. First, some articles in the journal are too boring. In general, research articles are a bit tedious to read than popular articles, but some articles are too tedious to read and are drowsy. Can your publication advocate that the written language of the author should be lively and vivid and that it should be more readable? A good research article should not only be profound in thought, but also have excellent language and layout. Do not think that people do not understand those terms can be considered a good article.