当代文学迄今已有60余载,为了推进学科“历史化”的进程,也为了对走过的道路进行富有深度的根源性反思,有必要改变比较固化的“思想阐释”研究理路,提出并实施史料整理与研究这个问题。从学科发生史角度看,近一二十年来,在现代文学史料学的影响推动下,当代文学史料整理与研究事实上已在逐步展开,并开始呈现出了某种良性回归与调整的态势。其基本形构,主要包括传统恒定史料与现实活态史料两个部分,以及政策导向型、政治批判型与政治检讨型三种类型。当然,当代文学史料整理与研究并不排斥思想,而是在“事实”与“思想”互动以及与文化保存制度相适的更高层面上实现主体的自由。 Contemporary literature has been in existence for more than 60 years so far. In order to carry forward the process of discipline “historicization ” and carry out a deep and fundamental reflection on the path it has undergone, it is necessary to change the comparatively solidified theory of “ideological interpretation” , Put forward and implement the historical data collation and research on this issue. From the perspective of academic history, in the past one or two decades, the consolidation and research of the historical materials of contemporary literature has been gradually started under the influence of the historical materials of modern literature and has begun to show a trend of benign regression and adjustment. Its basic structure includes two parts: traditional constant historical material and realistic active historical material, as well as three types of policy oriented, political critical and political review. Of course, the collation and study of the historical materials in contemporary literature do not exclude the idea, but rather the freedom to achieve the subject at a higher level of interaction between “truth” and “thought” and compatibility with the system of cultural preservation.