没有人说“体系”就是科学,但是所有谈论或强调“体系”的人都在潜意识里为“体系”立了科学的标杆。某种程度上说,“体系”的建立与完备就是一种科学的方向。如果“科学”两个字颠倒一下次序成为“学科”时,“体系”有了老窝。事实上,任何“体系”的发扬与光大都离不开学科的建构。学科的有效性、“体系”的科学性都是毋庸置疑的。但是,任何“体系”都有被解构的可能, No one says “system” is science, but all who talk about or emphasize “system” subliminally set the benchmark for “system.” To some extent, the establishment and completeness of “system” is a scientific direction. If “Science ” reversed the order of the word “discipline”, “system ” has a home. In fact, the development of any “system” can not be separated from the discipline construction. The validity of disciplines, the scientific nature of “system ” are beyond doubt. However, any “system ” has the possibility of deconstruction,