论文部分内容阅读
20世纪80年代“新历史小说”兴起后,当代文学对历史的言说又有一种新的观照和动向骤然凸显。这具体表现在对以往经典作品的解读上,很多小说家以解构的方式,采取搞笑手段,既轻松又随便地在戏说中任意涂抹、颠覆历史。于是,人们开始对传统文化进行调侃、对游戏人生给予认同,解构经典、戏说历史几乎成了近年影视剧创作的主流。鲁迅、巴金、曹禺、张恨水、张爱玲的名家名作以及所谓的“红色经典”被乔装打扮一番后,也开始粉墨登场。一种“泛娱乐化”“泛经典化”倾向在我国已呈愈演愈烈之势。如何看待这样一种现象,它的合理成分及不利影响何在?是应该大加挞伐、一概否定,还是分析其出现原因,理清其文化背景、社会心态、文学观点,正确对待? 上海师范大学人文学院博士生导师杨剑龙先生带领他的一批弟子,就此展开了一次别开生面的对话和讨论,甚有启发意义。本刊特予发表,企盼能为当前的经典解构和历史戏说现象提供一些有益的思考、必要的反省,以引起更多的关注。
After the rise of “new historical novels” in the 1980s, there is a new look and trend of contemporary literature on the history which has suddenly emerged. This is specifically reflected in the interpretation of the classic works of the past, many novelists to deconstruct the way to take funny means, both easily and casually painting in the arbitrariness, subversion history. As a result, people began to ridicule the traditional culture, to give recognition to the game life, deconstruction of the classic, history of the play has become almost the mainstream of the film and television drama in recent years. After Lu Xun, Ba Jin, Cao Yu, Zhang Hen-Shui and Zhang Ailing’s masters masterpieces and the so-called “red classic” were disguised as costumes, they also began to appear on stage. A tendency of “pan-entertainment” and “pan-classicalization” has become more and more serious in our country. How should we treat such a phenomenon, what is its reasonable composition and unfavorable influence? Should it be more or less denied, or should we analyze its causes, sort out its cultural background, social mentality and literary point of view and treat it properly? Humanities in Shanghai Normal University The college doctoral tutor Mr. Yang Jianlong led a group of his disciples, launched a unique dialogue and discussion, very inspiring. This publication is especially for publication, hoping to provide some useful thinking for the current classic deconstruction and historical phenomenon, the necessary reflection to attract more attention.