论文部分内容阅读
文章就许廷桂《〈诗经〉编者新说》一文提出商榷意见。许说《诗经》系“宣王肇始，平王编成”缺乏依据。《诗经》中为数不少的作品，分明产生在平王之后，孔子补编亦难自圆其说；“季札观乐”对史料有拣择、虚拟，不能据此认定襄公二十九年就有《诗》的定本而否定孔子删《诗》。许说《诗》乐是结合在一起的观点，也与史实不合。我国古代音乐发达很早，并非长期与诗、舞纠结而存在，《诗》被采合乐只是其中部分篇什。
The article on Xu Tinggui, “<,” a text to discuss the views. Xu said “the Book of Songs” Department “Xuan Wang Zhao began, Ping Wang compiled” lack of basis. The “Book of Songs” in a large number of works, clearly produced in Ping Wang, Confucius Supplementary difficult to justify; “Ji Zha concept of music” have the choice of the historical data, virtual, can not be found Xiangxiang twenty-nine years there is a “poem” And denied Confucius delete “poetry.” Xu said “poetry” music is a combination of point of view, but also with historical facts. Ancient Chinese music developed very early, not long-term existence of tangled poetry and dance, “Poetry” was adopted only part of the music.