论文部分内容阅读
目的研究武警不同执勤岗位哨兵的人格与心理健康、应对方式和社会支持的关系。方法采用症状自评量表,特质应对方式问卷,艾森克人格问卷和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)为测量工具,对武警某总队执勤岗位572名哨兵进行整群抽样调查。结果1各岗位哨兵的人格中E与总均分及消极应对呈负相关,与积极应对和社会支持呈正相关;N与总均分及消极应对呈正相关,与积极应对和社会支持呈负相关;P与总均分及消极应对呈正相关,与积极应对和社会支持呈负相关;2进入警卫哨兵E回归方程的有精神病性1个变量(P<0.05),进入N回归方程的有总均分1个变量(P<0.05)。进入P回归方程的有精神病性和消极应对2个变量(P<0.05);3在巡逻哨兵E回归方程的有抑郁1个变量(P<0.05),。进入N回归方程的有精神病性、消极应对和敌对3个变量(P<0.05),进入P回归方程的有精神病性和消极应对2个变量(P<0.05);4在守卫哨兵E回归方程的有积极应对和消极应对2个变量(P<0.05),进入N回归方程的有消极应对、社会支持和积极应对3个变量(P<0.05),进入P回归方程的有消极应对、社会支持和积极应对3个变量(P<0.05);5在看押哨兵E回归方程的有积极应对、焦虑和偏执3个变量(P<0.05),进入N回归方程的有焦虑、消极应对、社会支持和恐怖4个变量(P<0.05),进入P回归方程的有消极应对、社会支持和积极应对3个变量(P<0.05);6在守护哨兵E回归方程的有积极应对1个变量(P<0.05),进入N回归方程的有消极应对、积极应对和人际敏感3个变量(P<0.05),进入P回归方程的有恐怖、积极应对和消极应对3个变量(P<0.05)。结论武警不同执勤岗位哨兵的不同人格与心理健康、应对方式和社会支持有密切关系。
Objective To study the relationship between personality and mental health, coping styles and social support of sentinels in armed police with different duty positions. Methods A total of 572 sentinels were employed to carry out cluster sampling surveys on the self-rating scale of armed police force, trait coping style questionnaire, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) as measurement tools. Results 1E in each post guard sentinel was negatively correlated with total score and negative coping, positively correlated with active coping and social support. N was positively correlated with total score and negative coping, negatively correlated with active coping and social support. P was positively correlated with total score and negative coping, and negatively correlated with coping and social support. 2 There was 1 psychotic variable (P <0.05) entering sentry E-return equation and total score 1 variable (P <0.05). There were two variables (P <0.05) for entering the regression equation of psychiatry and the negative responses (P <0.05); 3 There were 1 variable of depression (P <0.05) in the E-regression equation of the sentry sentinel. There were 3 variables (P <0.05), including psychosis, negative coping and hostility, and psychiatric and negative responses to the P regression equation (P <0.05). 4 In the guarding sentry E regression equation There were two variables, positive response and negative response (P <0.05), negative response, social support and active response to the N regression equation (P <0.05), negative response to the P regression equation, social support and (P <0.05) .5 There were 3 variables (P <0.05), such as positive coping, anxiety and paranoid (P <0.05), and anxiety, negative coping, social support and horror entering the N regression equation (P <0.05), negative response, social support and active response to P regression equation (P <0.05) .6 There was a positive response to one variable in guardian sentinel E regression equation (P <0.05) ), Three variables (P <0.05), negative response, positive response and interpersonal sensitivity, and three variables (P <0.05) which entered into the P regression equation with negative response, positive response and negative response. Conclusions The different personality and mental health, coping style and social support of sentinel soldiers in different armed police positions are closely related.