论文部分内容阅读
“文章千古事,得失寸心知。”当“新材料作文”兴起时,语文老师们立即将相关写作模板“研制”出来;当“任务驱动式”作文大热时,我们马上又将这种作文的立意方法、段落结构、论证方法整理出来……可是学来写去,我们却悲哀地发现,期待中的“深刻”“丰富”“有文采”“有创新”的作文没有出现,却出现了大量低幼化、模式化的“假议论文”。画虎不成反类犬的结局,不得不让人反思,我们的议论文写作教学是否太过于急功近利?我们的议论文写作教学是否还得返璞归真,在“真”字上狠下功夫?
“The article is through the ages and gains and loses.” When the “new material composition” rises, the Chinese teachers immediately “research and develop” relevant writing templates; when the “task-driven” composition is hot We immediately sorted out the formulation method, paragraph structure, and argumentation method of this essay... But as we learned to write, we sadly discovered that the “deep ” “rich ” There is no composition of “” innovation, but there have been a large number of hypocritical, model “guess papers”. Drawing tigers is not an anti-canine dog outcome and people have to reflect on whether our argumentative writing teaching is too eager for quick success. Does our argumentative writing teaching still have to go back to basics and make great efforts on the word “true”?