论文部分内容阅读
20世纪50年代中期,国际共产主义运动中出现的斯大林批判与中国的“双百”思想运动,形成了一个具有内在关联的结构性“事件”。它的事件性格在于推动了对社会主义实践的理论探讨,并打开了由于冷战而在意识形态上被绝对化了的思想对立格局,为进一步在世界范围内深化对于两种民主制度的讨论提供了条件。在这个讨论中,除了共产党理论家之外,自由主义者也做出了重要的贡献。日本的自由主义知识分子进而关注到中国革命与苏维埃革命的区别,指出了前者所具有的亚洲特性。或许在今天借鉴50年代国外关于斯大林批判与中国革命的讨论,有助于我们开辟一些新的思路,在中国革命遗产中寻找那些未必能够直接套用、但却具有媒介功能的要素,重新思考中国民主化的真实道路。
In the mid-1950s, Stalin’s criticism in the international communist movement and China’s “double hundred” ideological movement formed a structural “incident” that was intrinsically linked. Its character in the incident lies in pushing forward the theoretical discussion of socialist practice and opening the ideologically antagonistic ideological confrontation as a result of the Cold War, providing further discussions on the two types of democratization in the world. condition. In this discussion, in addition to the Communist theorists, liberals also made important contributions. Japanese liberal intellectuals in turn paid attention to the difference between the Chinese revolution and the Soviet revolution, pointing out the Asian characteristics possessed by the former. Perhaps borrowing the foreign discussions on Stalin criticism and the Chinese revolution in the 1950s may help us to open up some new ideas and look for the elements in the Chinese revolutionary legacy that may not be directly applicable but have the function of a medium and rethink Chinese democracy The real road.