实质性正当程序的理论演变及其法律适用

来源 :江西社会科学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:tutu321
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
实质性正当程序是美国法院在司法审查中对正当程序条款能动解释的产物,对于防范政府以正当程序制定法律侵犯公民基本权利和自由具有重要价值。实质性正当程序的含义随着社会的变迁而发展,其适用范围从最初的保护财产权、契约自由,发展到20世纪后期主要适用于人身权利领域,尤其是对隐私权的保护。美国宪法创造性地发展出实质性正当程序,很大程度上得益于其建立了一套独特的检验方法。通过考察实质性正当程序的起源和演变,启示我们应树立正当程序的理念,以之指导当前的司法改革并完善宪法解释。 Substantive due process is the product of the active interpretation of the due process clauses by the U.S. courts in judicial review. It is of great value in preventing the government from infringing upon the basic rights and freedoms of citizens through due process law. The meaning of substantive due process develops with the change of the society. Its scope of application is from the initial protection of property rights and freedom of contract. It is mainly applied to the right of personal rights in the late 20th century, especially the protection of privacy. The United States Constitution has creatively developed substantial due process, largely thanks to the establishment of a unique set of test methods. By investigating the origin and evolution of substantive due process, it is suggested that we should establish the concept of due process to guide the current judicial reform and perfect the constitutional interpretation.
其他文献
“微时代”的现实发生是当代文化资本逻辑不断向前推进并持续加剧的必然结果,被这一时代网罗的人们无一不受着“微时代”潜在文化逻辑的暗示乃至训示。揭开这一资本-文化逻辑