论文部分内容阅读
口供补强规则与“罪从供定、信供为真”相反,视“以证印供、循证保真”为发现真相的手段,有利于被追诉人不被恣意定罪,减少冤狱,维护国家公信,然亦有或使实质犯罪人逃出法网、消耗更多司法资源等不利,但比较所得收益,此等不利属必然的代价。对此应有理性认识,可通过合理设置规则、正确执行规则和完善配套制度,将这类代价调控在必要、合理的范围之内。
On the contrary, depending on the evidence provided, evidence-based fidelity as a means of discovering the truth is conducive to being prosecuted and not being arbitrarily convicted, Redressing miscarriage of justice and safeguarding national credibility, but also have or make the actual perpetrators escape the French, consume more judicial resources and other unfavorable, but comparing the proceeds, such inconvenient to the inevitable price. There should be a rational understanding of this. We can regulate and control such costs within the necessary and reasonable scope by properly setting the rules, implementing the rules correctly and perfecting the supporting systems.