论文部分内容阅读
《ICSID仲裁规则》和《UNCITRAL仲裁规则》为国际投资争端仲裁所普遍选用。在国际投资争端仲裁实践的推动下,《ICSID仲裁规则》(2006)在增进透明度方面有重要进步,而修订中的《UNCITRAL仲裁规则》也表现出对程序透明度的高度关注。仲裁规则的变化、国际仲裁庭的实践、国际投资条约的发展表明投资争端仲裁程序增强透明度的必然性和可行性,同时应当以不干涉争端当事方的正当程序权利和尽量减少对仲裁程序正常进行的妨碍为原则。
The ICSID Arbitration Rules and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules are commonly used by the IIDA. The promotion of transparency in the ICSID Arbitration Rules (2006) has been greatly enhanced by the practice of arbitration in international investment disputes. The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules in the amendment also show great concern about the transparency of the proceedings. The changes in arbitration rules, the practice of international arbitral tribunals and the development of international investment treaties show the necessity and feasibility of enhancing the transparency of investment dispute arbitration procedures. At the same time, it is necessary to exercise due process rights and to minimize the arbitration proceedings The obstruction of the principle.