论文部分内容阅读
当前所有的关于评估和效度的专业性指南,都对预测源分数给予了特别的关注,而较少关注预测源本身。请看以下例子:*《教育与心理测验之标准》(AERA,1999,p.9):“效度是指测验的分数能够为测验用途提供解释所累计证据和理论支持的程度。”*《效度验证的原理与人事选拔程序应用》(SIOP,2003,p.4):“在发展和评估选拔程序中,效度是最重要的问题。因为效度验证包括积累证据以便为分数解释提供一个正确的科学基础。正是对用于某种途径的这些测验分数的解释才需要进行评价,而不是选拔程序本身。”
All of the current professional guidance on assessment and validity gives particular attention to the forecast source score, with less focus on the source of the forecast itself. Consider the following examples: * Criteria for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, 1999, p.9): “Validity refers to the degree to which tests can provide evidence and theoretical support for testing purposes.” “ * ”Principles of validity verification and application of HRP procedures“ (SIOP, 2003, p.4): ”Validity is the most important issue in the development and evaluation selection process because validation of validity includes accumulating evidence to Interpreting scores provides a sound scientific basis, and it is the interpretation of these test scores that is used in a given way that needs evaluation, not the selection process itself.