论文部分内容阅读
近年来由于金融危机席卷全球,东道国会采取一系列救市措施以保证本国经济稳定,可能会对投资者的利益造成损失。这使得ICSID受理的间接征收的案件越来越多,因此如何认定间接征收尤为重要。本文选取近年发生的中国平安诉比利时案为视角,从BIT规定方面、认定标准方面探讨间接征收的认定,并针对我国政府及企业如何应对提出一些相应的建议。
In recent years, due to the financial crisis sweeping the globe, the host country will adopt a series of rescue measures to ensure the stability of its economy and may cause losses to investors’ interests. This makes ICSID accepted more and more cases of indirect collection, so how to identify indirect acquisition is particularly important. This article selects China Ping An v. Belgium case which took place in recent years as the angle of view, explores the recognition of indirect collection from the aspects of BIT regulation and recognition standard, and puts forward some corresponding suggestions according to how our government and enterprises deal with it.