论文部分内容阅读
文章分析我国现有的司法裁判案例,发现公司股东盈余分配权诉讼中,有的法院依据公司有无分配决议直接裁定是否受理,大多数法院依据分配决议进行判决,法院裁决遵守公司自治原则,不做司法干预。我国《公司法》对有限责任公司股东盈余分配决议规定为资本决程序事项,对小股东的盈余分配权并无专门的条文加以保护。2016年4月最高人民法院发布的《最高人民法院关于适用若干问题的规定(四)(征求意见稿)》则对公司没有盈余分配方案决议但特定情况导致公司不分配利润的情况下,法院仍有可能支持股东的利润分配请求。文章认为该条款为我国股东盈余分配权的保护和制度的建立开启了新的路径。
The article analyzes the existing cases of judicial adjudication in our country and finds out that in the lawsuit of shareholders’ surplus distribution rights, some courts directly decide whether to accept or not according to whether a company has a distribution resolution or not. Most courts make decisions based on the distribution resolution, and the court adjudges to abide by the principle of corporate autonomy. Do judicial intervention. China’s “Company Law” provides for the resolution on the distribution of surplus of shareholders of limited liability companies as the capital order, and there is no special provision for the protection of surplus distribution rights of minority shareholders. In April 2016, Supreme People’s Court promulgated Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Applying for Certain Issues (IV) (Draft for Comment), but the Company still has no resolution on the proposal for the distribution of earnings but the special case does not result in the Company distributing profits. It is possible to support shareholders’ profit distribution requests. The article thinks that this article opens up a new path for the protection of our shareholders’ rights of surplus distribution and establishment of system.