论文部分内容阅读
“体系”与“法律体系”的思想源远流长。从近代早期直至19世纪“非欧几何”诞生之前,严格的公理化—演绎性体系模式一直居于主导地位。20世纪以来法学领域逐渐反对法律公理(规则)的演绎方法,而转向价值论—目的论上的“内部”体系模式。当代法律理论则从规范论—道义论层面对上述两种模式加以重构,提出了规则—原则相结合的法律规范体系模式。其中,法律规则与规则之间根据逐级授权关系形成了特定的层级构造;法律原则与原则之间则形成了抽象的、没有绝对优先关系的客观价值秩序;此外,法律规则基于特定“形式原则”的支撑,通常优先于法律原则。由此得到的法律体系具有规范性、程序性与动态性,兼顾了规则的确定性与原则(价值)的开放性特征。
The ideology of “system” and “legal system” goes back to ancient times. From the early modern period until the birth of “non-Euclidean Geometry” in the early 19th century, the strictly axiomatic-deductive system model has been dominant. Since the 20th century, the field of law gradually objected to the deduction of legal axioms (rules) and turned to the “inner” system model of value theory - teleology. Contemporary legal theory reconstructs the above two models from the norm-morality level, and puts forward the pattern of legal norm system combining rules with principles. Among them, the legal rules and rules form a specific hierarchical structure according to the level-by-level authorization relationship; between the legal principles and principles, there is an abstract objective value order without absolute priority; in addition, the legal rules are based on the specific “ Principle ”support, usually take precedence over legal principles. The resulting legal system is normative, procedural and dynamic, taking into account the certainty of the rules and the openness of the principle (value).