论文部分内容阅读
2003年最高人民法院《人身损害赔偿案件适用法律的若干解释》第6条对安全保障义务进行了规定,《侵权责任法(草案)》第37条对此加以继承和发展,顺应了时代潮流。该草案第37条在安全保障义务的归责原则、适用范围、适用主体及利益保护范围的界定方面仍存在可进一步探讨的空间。安全保障义务的归责原则应纳入过错责任范畴,其适用范围和义务主体均应适当扩展、保障的利益范围也应适当界定,以因应理论和实践发展的需要。
Article 6 of the Supreme People’s Court’s “Interpretation of Applicable Law on Personal Injury Compensation Cases” stipulates the obligation of safeguarding security. Article 37 of the Tort Liability Act (Draft) inherits and develops this and is in conformity with the trend of the times. Article 37 of the draft still has room for further exploration on the principle of imputation, the scope of application, the subject of application and the definition of the scope of protection of interests for security guarantee obligations. The principle of attribution of the obligation of safety and security should be included in the area of fault liability. The scope of application and the subject of obligation should be properly extended, and the scope of interests guaranteed should also be appropriately defined to meet the needs of theoretical and practical development.