市场规模、劳动分工和内生增长模型——兼论内生增长理论是否误解了Young?

来源 :世界经济文汇 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:al035258
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
本文构建了最终品和中间品种类不断变化的动态一般均衡模型,探讨市场规模、劳动分工和内生增长之间的关系,并且分析了内生增长理论与Young的区别。本文的研究表明,即使没有研发,劳动分工也会内生增长,内生增长的机制在于启动“劳动分工深化—市场规模扩大—劳动分工更加深化”的自我持续过程。本文构建的模型清晰地表明,内生增长理论在内生增长的源泉和机制方面与Young的不同。这具有重要的现实意义,按照内生增长理论,要实现长期增长只需要增加专利数目即可,而按照本文构建的模型和Young的思想,要实现长期增长关键在于增加符合市场需求的专利数目,从而可以启动劳动分工与市场规模不断深化的自我持续过程。 This paper constructs a dynamic general equilibrium model with varying types of final products and intermediate products, discusses the relationship between market size, division of labor and endogenous growth, and analyzes the difference between endogenous growth theory and Young. The research in this paper shows that even without research and development, the division of labor will endogenously increase. The mechanism of endogenous growth is to initiate the process of self-sustaining “deepening the division of labor, expanding the market scale and deepening the division of labor.” The model built in this paper clearly shows that endogenous growth theory is different from Young in terms of the sources and mechanisms of endogenous growth. This has important practical significance. According to endogenous growth theory, long-term growth requires only increasing the number of patents. According to the model and Young’s idea, the key to achieving long-term growth lies in increasing the number of patents that meet market demand, Which can start the process of division of labor and deepening market size of self-sustaining process.
其他文献
金庸笔下有许多形象鲜明的人物,韦小宝便是其中之一。作为收山之作,金庸一改以往的主人公是一武林高手、大侠的形象,塑造了韦小宝这样一个“反侠”形象:不会任何武功,但是享受到了
当前,随着中华文化的发展,中华文化的表现形式也是非常多样的。就艺术方面来说,中华文化在乐器方面表现得淋漓尽致。例如,古筝这一乐器就将带有特色的中华文化表现出来,这一
钢轨的承载能力问题以及工况参数对轮轨关系的影响已受到越来越多的关注。文章考虑车轮和钢轨系统几何形状及边界条件,利用有限元分析软件构建了轮轨系统滚动接触模型并进行了